Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 2100 outperforms the more expensive Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 2100 is 1335 days newer than the more expensive Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Radeon R7 250 - 86 vs 84 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Radeon R7 250 - $74.99 vs $101.05
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 2 vs 1 GB
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $101.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74122 minutes ago
Buy for $74.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
75.89743589743591%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
75.8779800051269%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |