Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 2100 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R7 250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 2100 is 1335 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Up to 63% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - $29.99 vs $79.99
- Up to 60% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - $0.86 vs $2.16 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon R7 250 - 37 vs 35 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 2 vs 1 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
35
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12192 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
37
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.16/FPS
39%
Price, $
$79.99
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |