Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms Radeon 760M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 3172 days older than Radeon 760M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 760M
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 15 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 10% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Radeon 760M - 80 vs 73 FPS
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Radeon 760M
Integrated • Jan 4th, 2023
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 760M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| Navi III IGP | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 512-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 2800 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
