Buy on Amazon
€157
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP $529
Availability
MSRP $529
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP $196
Availability
MSRP $196
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon w3-2425 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 42 days older than Xeon w3-2425.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Rust than Xeon w3-2425 - 236 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon w3-2425 - 16 vs 12 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-13400F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 10 core (6 P-core + 4 E-core) Cache 20 MB, fino a 4,6 GHz
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon w3-2425
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon w3-2425 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
PCs Using Xeon w3-2425 or Core i5-13400F
With selected game settings
99 FPS
€11.1/FPS
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,099
In Stock
90 FPS
€10.32/FPS
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€929
In Stock
90 FPS
€9.95/FPS
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€895.28
In Stock
99 FPS
€14/FPS
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,386.27
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
