Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon W-3175X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1435 days newer than Xeon W-3175X.
Advantages of Xeon W-3175X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 56 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 25% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon W-3175X - 135 vs 108 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 120 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€690
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €690 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 248 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W-3175X | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 16 |
56 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
255 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |