Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 47% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 135 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€690
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €690 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 225 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2697 v2 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |