Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2695 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2695 v2
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 115 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 50% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 135 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€786.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €786.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2695 v2 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |