Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 55% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 267 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
267
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€786.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €786.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |