Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3612 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 10% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-2620 - 327 vs 296 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 58 vs 95 Watts
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
327
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |