Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 21 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 0% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-12400 - 205 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - €81.33 vs €164.13
- Up to 50% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-12400 - €0.40 vs €0.80 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 249 minutes ago
Buy for €164.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 249 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-12100F | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |