The Xeon E5-2609 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 5700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Xeon E5-2609
The Ryzen 7 5700 is better in every way
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 5700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Xeon E5-2609 vs Ryzen 7 5700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-2609
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
166
83%
Min 1% FPS
112
85%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 5700
Apr 4th, 2022
Average FPS
199
100%
Min 1% FPS
131
100%
Price, €
€156.75
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-2609 vs Ryzen 7 5700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2609 vs Ryzen 7 5700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2609 vs Ryzen 7 5700 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2609
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 5700
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Xeon E5-2609 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $179.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Not Available |
| 80 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
| 10 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
