Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4294 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1260L
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than Xeon E3-1260L - 160 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 16 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 238 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |