Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E3-1260L v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2290 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L v5.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1260L v5
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 45 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 147 vs 130 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1260L v5 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |