Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3159 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v3.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 195 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 58 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1220 v3 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |