Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3543 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v2.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 31% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 122 vs 93 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 58 vs 69 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 8 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1220 v2 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |