The Ryzen 9 3950X is a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 3950X
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of the Core i7-10700F
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
Ryzen 9 3950X vs Core i7-10700F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 9 3950X
Nov 25th, 2019
Average FPS
193
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
191
99%
Min 1% FPS
126
99%
Price, €
€319.62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 3950X vs Core i7-10700F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 3950X vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 3950X vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 3950X
Nov 25th, 2019
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
16 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 9 3950X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$749.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
105 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
64 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |