Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700F is 979 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - 215 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €400.48 vs €402.59
- Up to 12% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - €1.86 vs €2.11 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €402.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
215
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€400.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €400.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700F | vs | Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |