Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 5396 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Phenom X4 9650
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Monster Hunter: World than Phenom X4 9650 - 270 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 16 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
270
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |