Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 4707 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 50% better in Rust than Xeon X5680 - 236 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5680 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€256
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €256 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |