Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400 is 979 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-10900F - 148 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €258.0 vs €272.66
- Up to 14% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-10900F - €1.74 vs €2.03 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400 - 20 vs 16 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€258
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €258 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6328 minutes ago
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6329 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |