Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3998 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 42% better in Dota 2 than Xeon X5675 - 238 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 58 vs 95 Watts
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
238
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €80.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Single-Core
499
22.426966292134832%
Multi-Core
2394
32.10406329623173%
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |