Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4342 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 32% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon X5675 - 423 vs 320 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5675 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
423
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€719.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €719.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |