Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3698 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 12% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon X5650 - 173 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
173
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€475.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €475.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16095 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |