Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 3773 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield V than Xeon X5650 - 253 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 32 vs 12 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 18648 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |