Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3123 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 109% better in Immortals of Aveum than Xeon X5650 - 48 vs 23 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 24 vs 12 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |