Buy on Amazon
€139.45
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 3698 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 31% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon W3680 - 189 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€139.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i3-10300, processore per sistemi desktop 4 core fino a 4,4 GHz LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 65 W
Buy for €139.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
