Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 2485 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 5% better in Apex Legends than Xeon W3680 - 274 vs 260 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
274
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €122.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |