Buy on Amazon
€22.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon W3680 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W3680 is 575 days older than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-4100 - 92 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Hegem AMD FX-Series FX4100 FX-4100 FX 4100 Processore CPU Quad-Core Quad-Thread da 3,6 GHz FD4100WMW4KGU Presa AM3+ Senza Ventola
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 409 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Xeon | Collection | FX |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
