Key Differences
In short — Xeon W3670 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W3670 is 409 days older than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3670
- Performs up to 2% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-4100 - 123 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon W3670 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon | Collection | FX |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |