Key Differences
In short — Xeon W3530 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W3530 is 575 days older than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3530
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon W3530 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3530 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon | Collection | FX |
Bloomfield | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |