Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 5036 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 130 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 32% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon W3520 - 418 vs 317 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
418
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€723.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €723.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4358 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 150 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |