Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3474 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon W3520 - 183 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |