Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 3855 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 130 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Fortnite than Xeon W3520 - 228 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 20 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
