Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 1867 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Borderlands 3 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 224 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 85 vs 165 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
