Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 507 days newer than Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-7920X - 132 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7920X - 56 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 140 vs 255 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 12 |
56 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
255 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |