Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 2667 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 56% better in F1 23 than FX-4100 - 225 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 56 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 95 vs 255 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon W | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 4 |
56 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
255 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |