Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2135 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2135 is 677 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2135
- Performs up to 3% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen 3 3200G - 294 vs 286 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2135 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2135 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-2135
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2135 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
