Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 1089 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 145 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 44 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 10% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 148 vs 135 FPS
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Broadwell | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 10 |
44 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
