Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2690 outperforms Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2690 is 181 days older than Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Performs up to 2% better in War Thunder than Core i3-3220 - 136 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 55 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
133
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €18.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11001 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
135 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |