Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 7% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 236 vs 220 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 65 vs 160 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€173
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €173 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
160 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |