Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 2135 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 8% better in HITMAN 3 than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 205 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 105 vs 115 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 24 vs 20 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 12 |
| 20 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
