Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 51% better in Diablo IV than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 215 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 85 vs 105 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Matisse | Codename | Haswell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 85 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |