Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 is 146 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670
- Performs up to 2% better in Lost Ark than FX-4100 - 225 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 - 95 vs 115 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |