Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1858 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 115 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 40% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Xeon E5-2670 v2 - 98 vs 70 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 - 24 vs 20 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2670 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 12 |
| 20 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
