Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 2557 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 254 vs 235 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 95 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
No | Overclockable | No |