Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600T outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600T is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600T
- Performs up to 37% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 239 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-13600T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
922
39.13412563667232%
Multi-Core
3652
29.746680785208113%
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
