Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 1688 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 6% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 497 vs 468 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
