Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 1688 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 170 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900 - 24 vs 16 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
