Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1495 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 60% better in FIFA 23 than Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 149 vs 93 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2660 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i3-8100
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
