Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770HQ outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4770HQ is 303 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770HQ - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770HQ
- Performs up to 8% better in Far Cry 5 than Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 198 vs 183 FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 47 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2660 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-4770HQ
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2660 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
433
42.5343811394892%
Multi-Core
3142
92.82127031019203%
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 5200 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
