Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1220 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 127 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |